nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP next-hop
From: Heath Jones <hj1980 () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 23:56:06 +0100
show bgp ipv4 unicast 100.10.0.0/16 why-chosen Would be insanely useful.
Been in JUNOS "show route" since day one, and IMHO is easily in the top 10 list of why I still buy Juniper instead of Cisco despite all the $%^&*ing bugs these days.
Its interesting, I was heavy into cisco years back and then juniper for a while. Going back to cisco now is great (always good for me to keep my exposure up), but there is just so much unclear in it's CLI. It wasn't until going back that I realised. I guess they would have to balance keeping the old timers & scripts etc happy VS bringing in new features that make the output look different.. Do you keep something that isn't perfect but people know how to use, or change it and cause more issues than good? ps. Juniper has really gone to $h!t lately. There's a website called glassdoor.com that I found - go look up what employees have to say about it.. reflects exactly the support we were getting, even as as an 'elite' partner..
Current thread:
- Re: BGP next-hop, (continued)
- Re: BGP next-hop Randy Bush (Sep 30)
- Re: BGP next-hop Franck Martin (Sep 30)
- Re: BGP next-hop Ingo Flaschberger (Sep 30)
- Re: BGP next-hop Randy Bush (Sep 30)
- Re: BGP next-hop Heath Jones (Sep 30)
- Re: BGP next-hop Randy Bush (Sep 30)
- Re: BGP next-hop Brett Watson (Sep 30)
- Re: BGP next-hop Christian Martin (Sep 30)
- Re: BGP next-hop Smith W. Stacy (Sep 30)
- Re: BGP next-hop Heath Jones (Sep 30)
- Re: BGP next-hop Richard A Steenbergen (Sep 30)