nanog mailing list archives
Re: IP addresses are now assets
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 02:17:08 -0800
Extra and unnecessary characters do not a correct word make. Owen On Dec 5, 2011, at 12:27 AM, cdel.firsthand.net wrote:
The British have been using the correct six character word length for humour ad memoriam. Christian de Larrinaga On 4 Dec 2011, at 15:15, Gary Buhrmaster <gary.buhrmaster () gmail com> wrote:On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 18:18, David Barak <thegameiam () yahoo com> wrote:Should the HAC be expected to manage the transition to HumorV6?I am not that familiar with Humorv6. Has Hv6 had sufficient operational input, or is it based on a philosophically pure redesign of humor making it theoretically funny, but in practice most of the humor falls flat. Does it require a redesign of the existing infrastructure (i.e. comedy clubs) in order to get the joke? And, of course, is the British implementation of HumourV6 compatible the American implementation of HumorV6? Gary
Current thread:
- Re: IP addresses are now assets, (continued)
- Re: IP addresses are now assets bmanning (Dec 02)
- Re: IP addresses are now assets Jay Ashworth (Dec 02)
- Message not available
- Re: IP addresses are now assets Gary Buhrmaster (Dec 03)
- Re: IP addresses are now assets Benson Schliesser (Dec 03)
- Re: IP addresses are now assets Robert Bonomi (Dec 03)
- Re: IP addresses are now assets Jay Ashworth (Dec 04)
- Re: IP addresses are now assets Gary Buhrmaster (Dec 04)
- Re: IP addresses are now assets cdel.firsthand.net (Dec 05)
- Re: IP addresses are now assets Owen DeLong (Dec 05)
- Re: IP addresses are now assets Jay Ashworth (Dec 05)