nanog mailing list archives
Re: New on RIPE Labs: The Curious Case of 128.0/16
From: Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 09:47:21 -0600
On 12/6/2011 9:38 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
I believe that Sprint is using Cisco, not Juniper. This is either a manual filter or there is another (unidentified) issue with some Cisco configurations.
People are less likely to read an RFC changing the reserved addresses. Even people who didn't filter unassigned addressing, might filter RFC reserved addressing. The fact that it's built into some routers automatically kind of makes the point.
Jack
Current thread:
- New on RIPE Labs: The Curious Case of 128.0/16 Mirjam Kuehne (Dec 06)
- Re: New on RIPE Labs: The Curious Case of 128.0/16 Chris Adams (Dec 06)
- Re: New on RIPE Labs: The Curious Case of 128.0/16 Jack Bates (Dec 06)
- Re: New on RIPE Labs: The Curious Case of 128.0/16 Henry Yen (Dec 06)
- Re: New on RIPE Labs: The Curious Case of 128.0/16 Chris Adams (Dec 07)
- Re: New on RIPE Labs: The Curious Case of 128.0/16 Chris Adams (Dec 06)