nanog mailing list archives
Re: GPON Vendors
From: Jonathan Towne <jtowne () slic com>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 23:58:03 -0500
Indeed, I'm very interested in the outcome of this, as well. I've been pestering my Calix SE for a long while about proper IPv6 support. -- Jonathan Towne On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 12:55:52PM +0800, Mark Tinka scribbled: # On Thursday, December 08, 2011 03:10:31 AM Frank Bulk wrote: # # > In late August Calix came to our site and tested their # > IPv6 support on the C7 platform for their upcoming 8.0 # > release. They tested both on GPON and VDSL2 using the # > N:1 (VLAN per service) approach. There were some issues # > that prevented all the CPE I had from working, but since # > then they've taken it back and completed that work. # > I've invited them back onsite to re-test so we can # > validate before they begin their controlled release. # # Sounds great. # # Keep us posted as they develop the software. It would be # interesting to see what issues arise in this area. # # Mark.
Current thread:
- GPON Vendors Josh V. Hoppes (Dec 06)
- RE: GPON Vendors Jeff Saxe (Dec 06)
- Re: GPON Vendors Mark Tinka (Dec 06)
- Re: GPON Vendors Nick Colton (Dec 06)
- Re: GPON Vendors Jonathan Towne (Dec 06)
- Re: GPON Vendors Mark Tinka (Dec 06)
- Re: GPON Vendors Owen DeLong (Dec 06)
- Re: GPON Vendors Mark Tinka (Dec 07)
- RE: GPON Vendors Frank Bulk (Dec 07)
- Re: GPON Vendors Mark Tinka (Dec 07)
- Re: GPON Vendors Jonathan Towne (Dec 07)
- Re: GPON Vendors Owen DeLong (Dec 06)
- RE: GPON Vendors Jeff Saxe (Dec 06)