nanog mailing list archives

Re: Sad IPv4 story?


From: Keegan Holley <keegan.holley () sungard com>
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 11:17:32 -0500

2011/12/10 <bmanning () vacation karoshi com>

On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 03:15:01AM -0500, Keegan Holley wrote:


Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 10, 2011, at 2:58 AM, Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:

I just had a personal email from a brand new ISP in the Asia-Pacific
area desperately looking for enough IPv4 to be able to run their
business the way they would likeb &

and we are supposed to be surprised or feel sorry?  you're kidding,
right?  they're lucky to be in a/p.  at least they can get a /22.

i especially like the "the way they would like" part.  the way i would
like to run my business is to go into the office every friday and scoop
up the cash that fell from the sky all week.

reality is such a pain in the ass.

randy

+1 aren't we way past all of the predicted exhaustion dates.  There are
slot of as's that have ignored this.



        predictions are ... predictions!  guesses.  swag.   nothing
more/less.

       i will say this however.  after fifteen years, I am exhausted
listening to

       ipv6 v. ipv4  bickering.   (and after five years of running native
ipv6-only

       networks - i've re-introduced ipv4 to the mix... go figure)

/bill

I see your point.  The world was supposed to end dozens of times as well.
 Sorry to hear you had to reintroduce v4.  I suppose if dinosaurs were
still around we'd have to capitulate to them too.  The people who see a
T-rex and say "hey I thought they were extinct?!" would just get eaten. but
I digress. I'm not sure I'd open a new ISP at this point and expect to get
any respectable amount of IP space from the RIR right now.


Current thread: