nanog mailing list archives
Re: Sad IPv4 story?
From: Joel jaeggli <joelja () bogus com>
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 21:42:04 -0800
On 12/10/11 17:48 , Barry Shein wrote:
I just had a personal email from a brand new ISP in the Asia-Pacific area desperately looking for enough IPv4 to be able to run their business the way they would like?This sniping elicited by the above seems inappropriate and unprofessional, the request/anecdote seemed reasonable and could elicit solutions such as partnerships, etc.
engineering solutions work with the constraints at hand. The maximum ipv4 delegation size to be issued in apnic is a /22. one has to assume that when it's gone it's gone. given that constraint, I know how I'd build it.
Current thread:
- Re: Sad IPv4 story?, (continued)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Philip Dorr (Dec 10)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Jimmy Hess (Dec 10)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Randy Bush (Dec 10)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Eric Parsonage (Dec 11)
- RE: Sad IPv4 story? Vitkovsky, Adam (Dec 12)
- RE: Sad IPv4 story? Leigh Porter (Dec 12)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Joel jaeggli (Dec 12)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Roland Perry (Dec 17)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Mark Tinka (Dec 12)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Randy Bush (Dec 10)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Joel jaeggli (Dec 10)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Joel jaeggli (Dec 10)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Jared Mauch (Dec 13)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Mark Tinka (Dec 14)