nanog mailing list archives
Re: Speed Test Results
From: Joe Maimon <jmaimon () ttec com>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 07:45:39 -0500
They are very useful for like-for-like comparison, for an indication of where your minimum performance levels are probably at, for a quick check that things are working properly and as expected.
To determine the exact max effective speed? To test qos policies? To determine whether you are meeting SLA's?
Not so much. Joe Leigh Porter wrote:
They are completely unreliable and not to be trusted except for an occasional general indication of speed.
Current thread:
- Speed Test Results jacob miller (Dec 23)
- Re: Speed Test Results Leigh Porter (Dec 23)
- Re: Speed Test Results Bret Clark (Dec 23)
- Re: Speed Test Results Joe Maimon (Dec 23)
- RE: Speed Test Results Paul Stewart (Dec 23)
- Re: Speed Test Results Cutler James R (Dec 23)
- RE: Speed Test Results Brandon Kim (Dec 23)
- Re: Speed Test Results Cutler James R (Dec 23)
- Re: Speed Test Results C Tate Baumrucker (Dec 23)
- Re: Speed Test Results Octavio Alvarez (Dec 23)
- Re: Speed Test Results Alex Brooks (Dec 23)
- Re: Speed Test Results Livingood, Jason (Dec 23)
- Re: Speed Test Results Joel Maslak (Dec 28)
- Re: Speed Test Results Joel Maslak (Dec 23)
- Re: Speed Test Results Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 23)
(Thread continues...)
- Re: Speed Test Results Leigh Porter (Dec 23)