nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPTV and ASM
From: Mark Tinka <mtinka () globaltransit net>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 17:15:16 +0800
On Thursday, December 29, 2011 06:19:14 AM Mike McBride wrote:
Agreed. I'm seeking confirmation, from IPTV implementers, that non igmpv3 support is the reason for using ASM with IPTV. Versus other reasons such as reducing state. Or is this a non issue and everyone is using SSM with IPTV?
We are running NG-MVPN (BGP replaces PIM, MPLS replaces IP/GRE). We run PIM-SM, not only because our customer's STB's only support IGMPv2 (we only transport IPTv content, not generate it), but also because, well, it just works and there hasn't been any compelling need to push for PIM-SSM. It's scaling well due to the nature of the NG-MVPN infrastructure itself. Mark.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Current thread:
- IPTV and ASM Mike McBride (Dec 28)
- Re: IPTV and ASM Marshall Eubanks (Dec 28)
- Re: IPTV and ASM Mike McBride (Dec 28)
- Re: IPTV and ASM Jeff Tantsura (Dec 28)
- Re: IPTV and ASM Glen Kent (Dec 28)
- Re: IPTV and ASM Mark Tinka (Dec 29)
- Re: IPTV and ASM Keegan Holley (Dec 28)
- Re: IPTV and ASM Mark Tinka (Dec 29)
- Re: IPTV and ASM Mike McBride (Dec 28)
- Re: IPTV and ASM Mark Tinka (Dec 29)
- Re: IPTV and ASM Marshall Eubanks (Dec 28)
- Re: IPTV and ASM Mark Tinka (Dec 29)
- Re: IPTV and ASM Mark Tinka (Dec 29)
- Re: IPTV and ASM Curtis, Bruce (Dec 29)
- Re: IPTV and ASM Olivier Benghozi (Dec 29)