RE: IPv6 mistakes, was: Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...

["George Bonser" <gbonser () seven com>]

> If you want to go on a wild goose chase, start chasing down 240/4 and
> you might make some progress.
>
> As i have mentioned before, it was only after i gave up on 240/4 for
> private network numbering that i really earnestly took on IPv6-only as
> a strategy.  Seeing 240/4 actually work would be nice, but i have
> already concluded it does not fit my exhaustion timeline given how
> many edge devices will never support it.
>
> If i have to fork lift, it should be for ipv6.

240/4 has been enabled in Linux since 2.6.25 (applied on January 21,
2008 by David Miller) so that's like three years already.