nanog mailing list archives
Re: Last of ipv4 /8's allocated
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 18:23:29 -0800
On Feb 1, 2011, at 5:06 PM, Leen Besselink wrote:
Doesn't really matter who gets what, because no one is going to route anything larger than a /8 anyway, particularly the RIR allocations. Just kinda fun to think about :-) -RandyHow about when HP/Compay/DEC buys Apple or the other way around ? ;-) They could do so in theory anyway.
At this point, IPv4 could be done before the regulatory process completed. Owen
Current thread:
- Re: Last of ipv4 /8's allocated, (continued)
- Re: Last of ipv4 /8's allocated Randy Carpenter (Feb 01)
- Re: Last of ipv4 /8's allocated Leen Besselink (Feb 01)
- Re: Last of ipv4 /8's allocated Randy Carpenter (Feb 01)
- Re: Last of ipv4 /8's allocated Jeroen van Aart (Feb 01)
- Re: Last of ipv4 /8's allocated Benson Schliesser (Feb 01)
- Re: Last of ipv4 /8's allocated Jeroen van Aart (Feb 01)
- Re: Last of ipv4 /8's allocated Owen DeLong (Feb 01)
- Re: Last of ipv4 /8's allocated Curtis Maurand (Feb 08)
- Re: Last of ipv4 /8's allocated Owen DeLong (Feb 08)
- Re: Last of ipv4 /8's allocated Curtis Maurand (Feb 08)
- Re: Last of ipv4 /8's allocated Owen DeLong (Feb 01)
- Re: Last of ipv4 /8's allocated Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 02)
- Re: Last of ipv4 /8's allocated David Conrad (Feb 01)
- Re: Last of ipv4 /8's allocated Randy Carpenter (Feb 03)