nanog mailing list archives
Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...)
From: Jimmy Hess <mysidia () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 00:35:09 -0600
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 2:24 AM, Zed Usser <zzuser () yahoo com> wrote:
Basic Internet services will work (web browsing, email, Facebook, Youtube,...), but: - Less torrenting - Less Netflix watching - Less FTP downloads - Less video streaming in general (webcams, etc.) You might take a hit on online gaming, but what else is there not to love? :)
Your sales department / helpdesk might have a bit of hassle of trying to undestand / explain this new Intertubes to the suck^H^H^H^Hcustomers, but most of them won't care either way.
Until some competitor who's not using NAT444 comes along and advertises that those functions work properly, maybe. Only for very liberal definitions of the phrase "won't care either way" Tolerate != won't care Most of them != People who won't eventually tell their friends or tweet about their frustrations For those who are connecting to watch Netflix, it is only marginally less annoying for the user than removing the "always on" feature of DSL, requiring customers to manually click an icon to dial in, and get a busy tone played / "All dialin 'lines are busy'" / "Please use IPv6 while you wait, wait 10 minutes and try dialing in again", if there are no global IPv4 IPs available at the moment they are trying to connect. Some might even strongly prefer that (time limited access and pay per connected hour) for periods of access to proper unique IPs over NAT444 brokenness; possibly with a customer choice between NAT444 and "time metered dynamic unique IP" and reasonably automatic simple means of switching between IP types on demand. -- -JH
Current thread:
- Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6naysayer...), (continued)
- Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6naysayer...) Owen DeLong (Feb 18)
- Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6naysayer...) Jeff Wheeler (Feb 18)
- Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6naysayer...) Owen DeLong (Feb 18)
- Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...) Benson Schliesser (Feb 18)
- Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...) Owen DeLong (Feb 18)
- Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...) Benson Schliesser (Feb 18)
- Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...) Chris Grundemann (Feb 18)
- Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...) Benson Schliesser (Feb 18)
- Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...) Chris Grundemann (Feb 18)
- Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...) Owen DeLong (Feb 18)
- Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...) Owen DeLong (Feb 21)