nanog mailing list archives
Re: Mac OS X 10.7, still no DHCPv6
From: Karl Auer <kauer () biplane com au>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 18:49:36 +1100
On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 12:57 +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
Except in the senarios being described they are also blocking the other addresses. I would also think setting the "M" bit would prelude the host from generating such addresses as they are unmanaged.
I think the M flag says "you can get an address via DHCP" - it doesn't say "and don't get an address via any other means". From RFC 4861: M 1-bit "Managed address configuration" flag. When set, it indicates that addresses are available via Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol [DHCPv6]. If you want to disable SLAAC, you instead use the AdvAutonomousFlag in the Prefix Information option included for the given prefix in the link's Prefix List.
DHCP has a couple of hundred defined options. Vendors have tried adding ONE to the RA protocol (DNS servers) as replacement functionality. That leaves them a few hundred options short, in my book.Which is what the O bit was for.
Welll - the number of options defined so far for DHCPv6 is very small compared to the number of options defined for DHCPv4. I think that's what Leo meant. The "O" bit will avail you naught if you want, for example, a boot server address. I do think though, that assuming DHCP is the way to get some of these things might be shooting from the hip. Perhaps there is a better way, with IPv6? The difficulty is that now everyone is in a tearing hurry; they just want everything to work the exact same way, and they want it NOW. There is "suddenly" no time to work out better ways. And goodness knows there must be a better way to boot a remote image than delivering an address via DHCP! With apologies to the musical "Keating": "Give us back our comfy little network Take us back to safer days of yore Nothing alien or scary, la-di-da or airy-fairy Just put it back the way it was before..." Regards, K. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Karl Auer (kauer () biplane com au) +61-2-64957160 (h) http://www.biplane.com.au/kauer/ +61-428-957160 (mob) GPG fingerprint: DA41 51B1 1481 16E1 F7E2 B2E9 3007 14ED 5736 F687 Old fingerprint: B386 7819 B227 2961 8301 C5A9 2EBC 754B CD97 0156
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Current thread:
- Re: Mac OS X 10.7, still no DHCPv6, (continued)
- Re: Mac OS X 10.7, still no DHCPv6 Dobbins, Roland (Feb 28)
- Re: Mac OS X 10.7, still no DHCPv6 Mark Andrews (Feb 27)
- Re: Mac OS X 10.7, still no DHCPv6 Simon Lockhart (Feb 27)
- Re: Mac OS X 10.7, still no DHCPv6 Mark Andrews (Feb 27)
- Re: Mac OS X 10.7, still no DHCPv6 Doug Barton (Feb 27)
- Re: Mac OS X 10.7, still no DHCPv6 Owen DeLong (Feb 27)
- Re: Mac OS X 10.7, still no DHCPv6 Joel Jaeggli (Feb 27)
- Re: Mac OS X 10.7, still no DHCPv6 Mark Andrews (Feb 27)
- Re: Mac OS X 10.7, still no DHCPv6 Leo Bicknell (Feb 27)
- Re: Mac OS X 10.7, still no DHCPv6 Mark Andrews (Feb 27)
- Re: Mac OS X 10.7, still no DHCPv6 Karl Auer (Feb 27)
- Re: Mac OS X 10.7, still no DHCPv6 Leo Bicknell (Feb 28)
- Re: Mac OS X 10.7, still no DHCPv6 Dobbins, Roland (Feb 28)
- Re: Mac OS X 10.7, still no DHCPv6 Karl Auer (Feb 27)
- Re: Mac OS X 10.7, still no DHCPv6 Mark Andrews (Feb 28)
- Re: Mac OS X 10.7, still no DHCPv6 Karl Auer (Feb 27)
- Re: Mac OS X 10.7, still no DHCPv6 Ray Soucy (Feb 27)
- RE: Mac OS X 10.7, still no DHCPv6 George Bonser (Feb 27)
- Re: Mac OS X 10.7, still no DHCPv6 Phil Regnauld (Feb 26)