nanog mailing list archives
Re: quietly....
From: Matthew Palmer <mpalmer () hezmatt org>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 07:12:26 +1100
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 10:47:50AM -0600, Jack Bates wrote:
On 2/3/2011 10:30 AM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:I'm perfectly happy with an IPv6 network that only has rational people on it while those who insist on NAT stay behind on IPv4.I'm perfectly happy with watching the Internet go to hell; as it has been, and IPv6 will just escalate it. :)
I am intrigued by your ideas, and wish to subscribe to your newsletter. Actually, I must agree that since I've stopped doing IT work professionally, I've found myself far less emotionally invested in this kind of thing, and far less worried about the world ending (which, let's face it, it rarely does). Does wonders for the blood pressure. - Matt
Current thread:
- Re: Failure modes: NAT vs SPI, (continued)
- Re: Failure modes: NAT vs SPI Joel Jaeggli (Feb 10)
- Re: Failure modes: NAT vs SPI Jay Ashworth (Feb 07)
- Re: Failure modes: NAT vs SPI Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 07)
- Re: Failure modes: NAT vs SPI Jack Bates (Feb 07)
- Re: Failure modes: NAT vs SPI Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 07)
- Re: quietly.... Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Jon Lewis (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 03)
- RE: quietly.... Matthew Huff (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Jack Bates (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Matthew Palmer (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Jack Bates (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Jay Ashworth (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... sthaug (Feb 03)
- RE: quietly.... david raistrick (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Mark Andrews (Feb 02)
- RE: quietly.... Frank Bulk (Feb 13)
- Re: quietly.... Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Owen DeLong (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Nick Hilliard (Feb 02)