nanog mailing list archives
Re: quietly....
From: Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 14:23:26 -0600
On 2/3/2011 1:28 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
The only reason FTP works through a NAT is because the NAT has already been hacked up to further mangle the data stream to make up for the mangling it does.
PASV
Current thread:
- Re: quietly...., (continued)
- Re: quietly.... Jack Bates (Feb 04)
- Re: quietly.... Owen DeLong (Feb 04)
- Re: quietly.... Owen DeLong (Feb 04)
- Re: quietly.... Jack Bates (Feb 05)
- RE: quietly.... Lee Howard (Feb 06)
- Re: quietly.... isabel dias (Feb 06)
- Re: quietly.... Owen DeLong (Feb 06)
- Re: quietly.... Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 04)
- Re: quietly.... Blake Dunlap (Feb 04)
- Re: quietly.... Jay Ashworth (Feb 04)
- Re: quietly.... Jack Bates (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... david raistrick (Feb 03)
- Failure modes: NAT vs SPI Jay Ashworth (Feb 03)
- Re: Failure modes: NAT vs SPI Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 03)
- Message not available
- Re: Failure modes: NAT vs SPI Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 07)
- Re: Failure modes: NAT vs SPI Owen DeLong (Feb 07)
- Re: Failure modes: NAT vs SPI Lamar Owen (Feb 10)
- Re: Failure modes: NAT vs SPI Owen DeLong (Feb 10)
- Re: Failure modes: NAT vs SPI Joel Jaeggli (Feb 10)
- Re: Failure modes: NAT vs SPI Jay Ashworth (Feb 07)
- Re: Failure modes: NAT vs SPI Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 07)