nanog mailing list archives
Re: "Leasing" of space via non-connectivity providers
From: John Curran <jcurran () istaff org>
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 12:24:01 -0500
On Feb 5, 2011, at 11:22 AM, bmanning () vacation karoshi com wrote:
as you pointed out back in oh, IETF-29, actual network operators don't participate much in the standards setting process so its no wonder RFC 2050 has (several) "blind-spots" when it comes to operational reality. and pragmatically, I am not sure that one could come to a single consistent suite of polciy for management of number resource. there's just too many ways (some conflicting) to use them. but this might be a sigma-six outlying POV. ARIN's community certinly is dominated by a particular type of network operator.
To the extent that the operator community does not participate in the open standards setting process in the IETF, and also opts not to participate in the open policy development process in the Regional Internet Registries, it is indeed challenging to make sure that the outcomes meet any operational reality. Since the results are useless for everyone if they don't work for the operator community, there is obviously pressure to try to fairly consider those needs as best understood, but it takes good inputs into the system somewhere if we want reasonable outcomes. (my humble opinion alone) /John
Current thread:
- Re: And so it ends..., (continued)
- Re: And so it ends... Owen DeLong (Feb 03)
- Re: And so it ends... Jon Lewis (Feb 03)
- "Leasing" of space via non-connectivity providers (was: Re: And so it ends... ) John Curran (Feb 03)
- Re: "Leasing" of space via non-connectivity providers Scott Helms (Feb 03)
- Re: "Leasing" of space via non-connectivity providers Matthew Kaufman (Feb 03)
- Re: "Leasing" of space via non-connectivity providers (was: Re: And so it ends... ) Jon Lewis (Feb 03)
- Re: "Leasing" of space via non-connectivity providers (was: Re: And so it ends... ) bmanning (Feb 05)
- Re: "Leasing" of space via non-connectivity providers (was: Re: And so it ends... ) Joel Jaeggli (Feb 05)
- Message not available
- Re: "Leasing" of space via non-connectivity providers John Curran (Feb 05)
- Re: "Leasing" of space via non-connectivity providers bmanning (Feb 05)
- Message not available
- Re: "Leasing" of space via non-connectivity providers John Curran (Feb 05)
- Re: "Leasing" of space via non-connectivity providers Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 05)
- Re: "Leasing" of space via non-connectivity providers Bill Woodcock (Feb 05)
- Re: "Leasing" of space via non-connectivity providers bmanning (Feb 05)
- Re: "Leasing" of space via non-connectivity providers Bill Woodcock (Feb 05)
- Re: "Leasing" of space via non-connectivity providers bmanning (Feb 05)
- Message not available
- Re: "Leasing" of space via non-connectivity providers John Curran (Feb 05)
- Re: "Leasing" of space via non-connectivity providers bmanning (Feb 05)
- Message not available
- Re: "Leasing" of space via non-connectivity providers John Curran (Feb 05)
- Re: "Leasing" of space via non-connectivity providers David Conrad (Feb 05)
- Re: "Leasing" of space via non-connectivity providers John Curran (Feb 05)