nanog mailing list archives
Re: US Warships jamming Lebanon Internet
From: Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 12:53:14 -0600
On 2/8/2011 7:41 AM, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
It is PLL LNB, one carrier, we are using full transponder 36 Mhz. There is almost no other users on this satellite (inclined more than 1.5 degree), and other carriers center frequency 100Mhz away.
Since no one else will, "I blame solar flares!" Jack
Current thread:
- Re: US Warships jamming Lebanon Internet, (continued)
- Re: US Warships jamming Lebanon Internet Ryan Wilkins (Feb 07)
- Re: US Warships jamming Lebanon Internet George Herbert (Feb 07)
- RE: US Warships jamming Lebanon Internet Thomas Magill (Feb 08)
- Re: US Warships jamming Lebanon Internet Adrian Chadd (Feb 08)
- Re: US Warships jamming Lebanon Internet Denys Fedoryshchenko (Feb 08)
- Re: US Warships jamming Lebanon Internet Adrian Chadd (Feb 08)
- Re: US Warships jamming Lebanon Internet Denys Fedoryshchenko (Feb 08)
- Re: US Warships jamming Lebanon Internet TR Shaw (Feb 08)
- Re: US Warships jamming Lebanon Internet Denys Fedoryshchenko (Feb 08)
- Re: US Warships jamming Lebanon Internet Jack Bates (Feb 08)
- Re: US Warships jamming Lebanon Internet denys (Feb 12)
- Re: US Warships jamming Lebanon Internet Michael Painter (Feb 12)
- Re: US Warships jamming Lebanon Internet denys (Feb 12)
- Re: US Warships jamming Lebanon Internet Marshall Eubanks (Feb 12)
- Re: US Warships jamming Lebanon Internet denys (Feb 14)
- Re: US Warships jamming Lebanon Internet Denys Fedoryshchenko (Feb 08)