nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links
From: Grzegorz Janoszka <Grzegorz () Janoszka pl>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:11:25 +0100
On 24-01-11 13:59, Carlos Friacas wrote:
Using /126s or /127s (or even /120s) is a result of going with the v4 mindset of conservation.
Not only, there are some other advantages of using /126's, like reducing number of ND requests on the link and the size of neighbor tables. -- Grzegorz Janoszka
Current thread:
- IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links Lasse Jarlskov (Jan 24)
- Re: IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links Carlos Friacas (Jan 24)
- Re: IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links Grzegorz Janoszka (Jan 24)
- Re: IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links Marco Hogewoning (Jan 24)
- Re: IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links bmanning (Jan 24)
- Re: IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links Jack Bates (Jan 24)
- Re: IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links Crist Clark (Jan 24)
- Re: IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links Owen DeLong (Jan 24)
- Re: IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links Randy Bush (Jan 24)
- Re: IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links Blake Hudson (Jan 31)
- Re: IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links Randy Bush (Jan 31)
- Re: IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links Blake Hudson (Jan 31)
- Re: IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links Randy Bush (Jan 31)
- Re: IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links bmanning (Jan 24)
- Re: IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links Carlos Friacas (Jan 24)