nanog mailing list archives
Re: NIST IPv6 document
From: Phil Regnauld <regnauld () nsrc org>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 18:26:30 +0100
Jeff Wheeler (jsw) writes:
IPv4)
[...]
Not good, but also does not affect any other interfaces on the router.
You're assuming that all routing devices have per-interface ARP tables.
IPv6) Typically, this breaks not just on that interface, but on the entire router. This is much worse than the v4/ARP sitation.
Inverse assumption here. Doesn't change much to the case scenario you've put forward as a cause to the problem, but still wanted to point it out. Cheers, Phil
Current thread:
- Re: NIST IPv6 document, (continued)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document TJ (Jan 07)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Justin M. Streiner (Jan 07)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Owen DeLong (Jan 07)
- Message not available
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Tim Chown (Jan 10)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Owen DeLong (Jan 10)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jack Bates (Jan 10)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jeff Wheeler (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Joel Jaeggli (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jeff Wheeler (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Phil Regnauld (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jeff Wheeler (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Phil Regnauld (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Mark Smith (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Owen DeLong (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Phil Regnauld (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jack Bates (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Richard Barnes (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document TJ (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jeff Wheeler (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Dobbins, Roland (Jan 05)