nanog mailing list archives
Re: Ipv6 for the content provider
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 17:09:07 -0500
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 13:56:05 PST, Charles N Wyble said:
The only issue I've faced is RHEL/CentOS doesn't have stateful connection tracking for IPv6 - so ip6tables is practically worthless.Hmmmm. Interesting. I wonder if this is specific to the RedHat kernel? Or a problem with v6 support on Linux in general?
(Linux kernels are trying to stick to a release-every-3-months schedule). RHEL/CentOS 5 is using a 2.6.18 kernel. The needed support for stateful IPv6 landed in 2.6.21 or so (so almost a year after RHEL 5 did its feature freeze). RHEL 6 is apparently a 2.6.32 kernel so it should be there. Cutting edge kernel is currently 2.6.38-rc2.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Ipv6 for the content provider, (continued)
- Re: Ipv6 for the content provider Owen DeLong (Jan 26)
- Re: Ipv6 for the content provider Antonio Querubin (Jan 26)
- Re: Ipv6 for the content provider Owen DeLong (Jan 26)
- Re: Ipv6 for the content provider Antonio Querubin (Jan 26)
- Re: Ipv6 for the content provider Jared Mauch (Jan 27)
- Re: Ipv6 for the content provider Owen DeLong (Jan 26)
- Re: Ipv6 for the content provider Dale W. Carder (Jan 26)
- Re: Ipv6 for the content provider Charles N Wyble (Jan 26)
- Re: Ipv6 for the content provider Randy McAnally (Jan 26)
- Re: Ipv6 for the content provider Lamar Owen (Jan 26)
- Re: Ipv6 for the content provider Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 26)
- Re: Ipv6 for the content provider Blake Hudson (Jan 31)
- Re: Ipv6 for the content provider Simon Perreault (Jan 31)
- Re: Ipv6 for the content provider Blake Hudson (Jan 31)
- Re: Ipv6 for the content provider Randy McAnally (Jan 31)
- Re: Ipv6 for the content provider Lamar Owen (Jan 31)