nanog mailing list archives
Re: NIST IPv6 document
From: sthaug () nethelp no
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 19:09:24 +0100 (CET)
All the same, beware of the anycast addresses if you want to use a smaller block for point-to-point and for LANs, you break stateless autoconfig and very likely terminally confuse DHCPv6 if your prefix length isn't /64.
Breaking stateless autoconfig such that it *cannot* ever work, on my router point-to-point links, is a *feature*. Not a problem. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug () nethelp no
Current thread:
- Re: NIST IPv6 document, (continued)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Dobbins, Roland (Jan 07)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document TJ (Jan 07)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Owen DeLong (Jan 07)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jeff Wheeler (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Joe Greco (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Kevin Oberman (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Robert E. Seastrom (Jan 07)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Mark Smith (Jan 08)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Owen DeLong (Jan 08)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Owen DeLong (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document sthaug (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Dobbins, Roland (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Leen Besselink (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Philip Dorr (Jan 05)