nanog mailing list archives
Re: Verizon acquiring Terremark
From: Peter Beckman <beckman () angryox com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 22:54:14 -0500
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011, Jimmy Hess wrote:
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Jeffrey Lyon <jeffrey.lyon () blacklotus net> wrote:One cannot be owned by a carrier and remain carrier neutral. My two cents,Agreed. An organization being a fully owned subsidiary of one carrier, and claiming to be completely carrier neutral, is an indelible conflict of interest;
One of my colleagues was discussing this today. http://bit.ly/emZ7uA -> http://www.alcatel-lucent.com/wps/portal/... Equinix has been claiming to have carrier neutral exchanges since Oct 2009. Who is using them and are they, in your opinion, being completely carrier neutral? Maybe it is possible. Beckman --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peter Beckman Internet Guy beckman () angryox com http://www.angryox.com/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Verizon acquiring Terremark Ryan Finnesey (Jan 31)
- Re: Verizon acquiring Terremark Scott Howard (Jan 31)
- Re: Verizon acquiring Terremark Jeffrey Lyon (Jan 31)
- Re: Verizon acquiring Terremark Randy Bush (Jan 31)
- Re: Verizon acquiring Terremark Jimmy Hess (Jan 31)
- Re: Verizon acquiring Terremark Peter Beckman (Jan 31)
- Re: Verizon acquiring Terremark Ernie Rubi (Jan 31)
- Re: Verizon acquiring Terremark Jimmy Hess (Jan 31)
- Re: Verizon acquiring Terremark Benson Schliesser (Jan 31)
- Re: Verizon acquiring Terremark Jeffrey Lyon (Jan 31)
- Re: Verizon acquiring Terremark Scott Howard (Jan 31)