nanog mailing list archives
Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you?
From: Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 11:43:01 -0600
On 1/10/2011 11:03 AM, Greg Whynott wrote:
Brocade device's pre Foundry purchase correct? I can't see anyone that large using Foundry in large deployments..
People (who should know) have told me L3 does for some of their 10GE bonding. If you want high end at low cost, the box does it. Just price 100GE cards at the different vendors. :)
Jack
Current thread:
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you?, (continued)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? lorddoskias (Jan 10)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Brandon Kim (Jan 10)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 10)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Owen DeLong (Jan 10)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Thomas Donnelly (Jan 10)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Brandon Kim (Jan 10)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Justin M. Streiner (Jan 10)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Greg Whynott (Jan 10)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Brandon Kim (Jan 10)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? lorddoskias (Jan 10)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Greg Whynott (Jan 10)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Jack Bates (Jan 10)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? b nickell (Jan 10)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Miquel van Smoorenburg (Jan 10)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Jethro R Binks (Jan 11)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Brandon Kim (Jan 11)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Jack Bates (Jan 11)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Seth Mattinen (Jan 11)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Greg Whynott (Jan 10)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Justin M. Streiner (Jan 11)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Ron Broersma (Jan 11)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Charles N Wyble (Jan 10)