nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cisco Sanitization
From: JC Dill <jcdill.lists () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 11:41:18 -0800
On 12/01/11 11:05 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
Well, here it is. Perhaps you might consider getting a gmail or other account, and posting on NANOG from there. Either that, or filter Randy out. Personally, I find those silly disclaimers annoying, but am far too lazy to set up a script such as Randy has.disclaimers used to be against nanog list policy.
Randy,If you want to cite list policy, let's start by noting that it's a clear violation of the nanog list AUP to setup an autoresponder reply to list email[1], no matter if the autoresponder replies to the list or just to the poster. You must whitelist email from the list before applying an autoresponder. If you don't want to see the disclaimer-laden emails, then you can whitelist, then send posts with disclaimers (along with all other posts you don't care to read) to dev/null.
OTOH, there is nothing in the AUP about disclaimers. Disclaimers, top posting, excessive quoting, etc. are discouraged (considered poor netiquette) but not outright forbidden.
jc [1] http://www.nanog.org/mailinglist/index.php8) Autoresponders sending mail either to the list or to the poster are prohibited.
Current thread:
- Cisco Sanitization Green, Timothy (Jan 12)
- Re: Cisco Sanitization John Orthoefer (Jan 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Fw: Cisco Sanitization Greg Whynott (Jan 12)
- Re: Fw: Cisco Sanitization Scott Morris (Jan 12)
- Message not available
- Re: Cisco Sanitization Greg Whynott (Jan 12)
- Re: Cisco Sanitization Lynda (Jan 12)
- Re: Cisco Sanitization Greg Whynott (Jan 12)
- Re: Cisco Sanitization Justin M. Streiner (Jan 12)
- Re: Cisco Sanitization Randy Bush (Jan 12)
- Re: Cisco Sanitization JC Dill (Jan 12)
- Re: Cisco Sanitization Michael Hallgren (Jan 12)
- Re: Cisco Sanitization Jason LeBlanc (Jan 14)