nanog mailing list archives
Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?
From: Mark Smith <nanog () 85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc nosense org>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 18:30:16 +1030
On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 00:12:26 -0500 Jim Gettys <jg () freedesktop org> wrote:
On 01/15/2011 06:30 PM, Mark Smith wrote:On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 18:06:06 -0500 (EST) Brandon Ross<bross () pobox com> wrote:On Sat, 15 Jan 2011, Brian Keefer wrote:Actually there are a couple very compelling reasons why PAT will probably be implemented for IPv6:You are neglecting the most important reason, much to my own disdain. Service providers will continue to assign only a single IP address to residential users unless they pay an additional fee for additional addresses.How do you know - have you asked 100% of the service providers out there and they've said unanimously that they're only going to supply a single IPv6 address?Can we *please* stop this pointless thread?
I don't think it pointless to network operators - NAT or not has operational impacts on troubleshooting, network design, addressing plans etc. I understand you aren't a network operator, so if you're not interested perhaps you should unsubscribe. Thanks, Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?, (continued)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Owen DeLong (Jan 15)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Mark Smith (Jan 15)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Brandon Ross (Jan 15)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Mark Smith (Jan 15)
- RE: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Frank Bulk (Jan 15)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Owen DeLong (Jan 15)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Mark Smith (Jan 15)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Owen DeLong (Jan 15)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Owen DeLong (Jan 15)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Jim Gettys (Jan 15)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Mark Smith (Jan 16)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Jim Gettys (Jan 16)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Owen DeLong (Jan 12)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Lamar Owen (Jan 13)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Owen DeLong (Jan 12)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Dave Pooser (Jan 12)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 12)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Jack Bates (Jan 12)
- RE: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Nathan Eisenberg (Jan 12)