nanog mailing list archives

Re: FAA - ASDI servers


From: Merike Kaeo <merike () doubleshotsecurity com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 21:13:58 -0800

I've pinged someone offline who may have a contact.   Will let you know offline if I do and connect you.   I had some 
peripheral insight a few years ago when I did some work with Boeing.  Even had a hand at editing some ARINC standards.  
The airline industry was umm....interesting :)  Suffice to say the guy I was working with at Boeing was pushing hard 
for v6 capability within ARINC and this was 2007.  Keep fingers crossed.

- merike

On Jan 4, 2011, at 8:57 PM, Ryan Finnesey wrote:

Can they simply extend the mandate?   We need to setup new connectivity
to the FFA and was hoping to go IPv6 right out of the gate.
Cheers
Ryan


-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Oberman [mailto:oberman () es net] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 11:12 PM
To: Christopher Morrow
Cc: Ryan Finnesey; nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: FAA - ASDI servers 

Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 22:49:34 -0500
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>

On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:39 PM, Ryan Finnesey 
<ryan.finnesey () harrierinvestments com> wrote:
Very true but why the reference to vacuum tubes?

sadly it was an FAA computer system joke.

But, since the "F" stands for Federal, if it is still up in two years,
it must be reachable by IPv6. Today, the odds are pretty slim as almost
no federal systems are reachable by IPv6. It will be an interesting two
years for a lot of federal IT folks as the mandate is from the OMB who
can pull a budget for non-compliance.
--
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab)
E-mail: oberman () es net                     Phone: +1 510 486-8634
Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4  EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751




Current thread: