nanog mailing list archives
Re: "L3DSR -- Overcoming Layer 2 Limitations of Direct Server Return Load Balancing" Video?
From: Matt Hite <lists () beatmixed com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 15:40:30 -0700
Hi, Jan. It's a great presentation and I really love your approach. However, I am curious -- why was IP-in-IP not pursued? I know the presentation mentioned the MTU issue, but your final solution seemed full of enough pitfalls itself (ie -- lots of cooperation from numerous groups, people, and processes) that raising MTU in your network might be an easier proposition. Thought you might have went into it a bit in the video, that's all. Any insight? -M On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Jan Schaumann <jschauma () netmeister org> wrote:
Matt Hite <lists () beatmixed com> wrote:Might someone have the video for this presentation in their personal stash? http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog51/presentations/Monday/NANOG51.Talk45.nanog51-Schaumann.pdfI don't have the video handy, but there really wasn't all that much more info in the presentation than in the slides. It might be worth noting that the modules are now open source: https://github.com/yahoo/l3dsr If you have questions, just email me. -Jan
Current thread:
- "L3DSR -- Overcoming Layer 2 Limitations of Direct Server Return Load Balancing" Video? Matt Hite (Jul 26)
- Re: "L3DSR -- Overcoming Layer 2 Limitations of Direct Server Return Load Balancing" Video? Jan Schaumann (Jul 26)
- Re: "L3DSR -- Overcoming Layer 2 Limitations of Direct Server Return Load Balancing" Video? Matt Hite (Jul 26)
- Re: "L3DSR -- Overcoming Layer 2 Limitations of Direct Server Return Load Balancing" Video? Jan Schaumann (Jul 26)
- Re: "L3DSR -- Overcoming Layer 2 Limitations of Direct Server Return Load Balancing" Video? Matt Hite (Jul 26)
- Re: "L3DSR -- Overcoming Layer 2 Limitations of Direct Server Return Load Balancing" Video? Jan Schaumann (Jul 26)