nanog mailing list archives
RE: dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers
From: Leo Vegoda <leo.vegoda () icann org>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 16:02:14 -0700
You wrote:
Also, one can argue that a dynamic prefix facilitates privacy ŠIn Germany, there is significant political pushback against the idea to give residential mom+pop static prefixed for that very reason.
Do German web sites not track users with cookies, then? Regards, Leo
Current thread:
- dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Jul 26)
- Re: dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers Jeroen Massar (Jul 26)
- Re: dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Jul 26)
- Re: dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers Daniel Roesen (Jul 26)
- Re: dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers Mark Andrews (Jul 26)
- Re: dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers Owen DeLong (Jul 26)
- RE: dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers Leo Vegoda (Jul 26)
- Re: dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers Owen DeLong (Jul 26)
- Re: dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 26)
- Re: dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers Owen DeLong (Jul 26)
- Re: dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers Matt Addison (Jul 26)
- Re: dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers Matthew Kaufman (Jul 26)
- Re: dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers Owen DeLong (Jul 26)
- Re: dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Jul 26)
- Re: dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers Jeroen Massar (Jul 26)
- Re: dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers Karl Auer (Jul 26)
- Re: dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers Jason Baugher (Jul 26)
- Re: dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers Mark Andrews (Jul 26)