nanog mailing list archives

Re: SORBS contact

From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 23:24:30 +0100

On 29/07/2011 22:55, Michelle Sullivan wrote:

Friendly or non friendly response is usually gaugable in advance by the
tone of the initial email.


Which is usually gaugeable in advance by the tone of the customer
complaints that precipitated contact with SORBS in the first place.

Email is such a lousy medium for this.  We're all much more decent people
in person than over snarky emails.

Nick

Current thread:

Re: [BULK] Re: SORBS contact, (continued)
- - - Re: [BULK] Re: SORBS contact Rich Kulawiec (Jul 30)
    - Re: [BULK] Re: SORBS contact Michelle Sullivan (Jul 30)
    - Re: [BULK] Re: SORBS contact Ken Chase (Jul 30)
    - Re: [BULK] Re: SORBS contact Michelle Sullivan (Jul 30)
    - Re: [BULK] Re: SORBS contact Paul Graydon (Jul 30)
    - Re: [BULK] Re: SORBS contact Jimmy Hess (Jul 30)
    - Re: [BULK] Re: SORBS contact Michelle Sullivan (Jul 30)
    - RE: [BULK] Re: SORBS contact Nathan Eisenberg (Jul 30)
    - Re: [BULK] Re: SORBS contact Michelle Sullivan (Jul 30)
    - Re: SORBS contact Michelle Sullivan (Jul 29)
    - Re: SORBS contact Nick Hilliard (Jul 29)
    - Re: SORBS contact Paul Graydon (Jul 29)
    - Re: SORBS contact Michelle Sullivan (Jul 30)
    - Re: SORBS contact Adam Atkinson (Jul 29)