Re: Why is IPv6 broken?

[Tom Hill <tom () ninjabadger net>]

On Sun, 2011-07-10 at 10:14 -0400, Jeff Wheeler wrote:
> Cogent's policy of requiring a new contract, and from what I am still
> being told by some European customers, new money, from customers in
> exchange for provisioning IPv6 on existing circuits, means a simple
> technical project gets caught up in the complexities of budgeting and
> contract execution.

"Can we have IPv6 transit?"
"Yes, please turn up a session to.."

That was asking Cogent for IPv6 dual-stack on our existing IPv4
transit. 

I'm not saying it's any good, but it certainly didn't cost extra.

Tom