nanog mailing list archives

Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs


From: Jay Ashworth <jra () baylink com>
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 21:37:31 -0400 (EDT)

Vix:
i think he's seen RFC 1034 :-). anyway, i don't see the difference
between http://sony/ and http://sony./

The fact that the resolution of "sony." is deterministic, and that of 
"sony" is location dependent?

i think we have to just discourage lookups of single-token names,
universally.

In order to do which, we have to discourage their *deployment*.

And if by "universally" you mean "no Jay, you can't say 'telnet dns1' 
from your desktop machine to get to your inhouse nameserver, then I'm just
gonna have to go ahead and disagree with ya' there, Vix.  :-)

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth                  Baylink                       jra () baylink com
Designer                     The Things I Think                       RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates     http://baylink.pitas.com         2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA      http://photo.imageinc.us             +1 727 647 1274


Current thread: