nanog mailing list archives
Re: Why no IPv6-only day (Was: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol)
From: Gregory Edigarov <greg () bestnet kharkov ua>
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 11:53:51 +0300
On Sat, 4 Jun 2011 10:58:05 -0500 Jimmy Hess <mysidia () gmail com> wrote:
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Brandon Butterworth <brandon () rd bbc co uk> wrote: [snip]This W6D is about turning v6 on. At some point, many years from now, when everyone has got bored of supporting legacy v4 for a hand full of legacy users there might be a v6 only day where we turn v4 off to test if it can be generally ceased.Or maybe at some point a year or so from now... display a warning to all users accessing the site over IPv4; reminding them of the need to upgrade their internet connection to IPv6 in order to be able to access new 'premium' content :-)
Hope it will NEVER happen
Current thread:
- Re: Why no IPv6-only day (Was: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol) Brandon Butterworth (Jun 04)
- Re: Why no IPv6-only day (Was: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol) Jimmy Hess (Jun 04)
- Re: Why no IPv6-only day (Was: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol) Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 04)
- Re: Why no IPv6-only day (Was: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol) Owen DeLong (Jun 04)
- Re: Why no IPv6-only day (Was: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol) Gregory Edigarov (Jun 06)
- Re: Why no IPv6-only day (Was: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol) Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 04)
- Re: Why no IPv6-only day (Was: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol) Jimmy Hess (Jun 04)