nanog mailing list archives
Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
From: Tony Finch <dot () dotat at>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:14:30 +0100
On 21 Jun 2011, at 00:29, Mark Andrews <marka () isc org> wrote:
I will repeat my assertion. There is no such thing as glue records for the nameservers at the top of the zone within the zone itself be they in-baliwick or not. Glue records live in the parent zone and are there to avoid the catch 22 situation of needing the records to find the records.
I understand "in-bailiwick" to be a property of the name of a nameserver, independent of whether you are looking at the glue or authoritative NS RRs - it is not the same as "in-zone". In-bailiwick nameservers must have glue. But you said ''There is also no such thing as 'in-bailiwick glue for the TLD's DNS servers'.'' I think you are arguing about the meaning and location of glue, whereas I am arguing about the meaning of "in-bailiwick". Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <dot () dotat at> http://dotat.at/
Current thread:
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs, (continued)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Paul Vixie (Jun 19)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Doug Barton (Jun 19)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Paul Vixie (Jun 19)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Doug Barton (Jun 19)
- future revenue at risk vs near term cost ratio Mike Leber (Jun 19)
- Re: future revenue at risk vs near term cost ratio Doug Barton (Jun 20)
- Message not available
- Re: future revenue at risk vs near term cost ratio Tim Chown (Jun 20)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Mark Andrews (Jun 20)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Tony Finch (Jun 20)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Mark Andrews (Jun 20)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Tony Finch (Jun 21)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Mark Andrews (Jun 19)
- RE: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs George Bonser (Jun 19)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Mark Andrews (Jun 19)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs David Conrad (Jun 19)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Mark Andrews (Jun 19)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs David Conrad (Jun 19)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Mark Andrews (Jun 19)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs David Conrad (Jun 19)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Robert Bonomi (Jun 20)
- RE: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs George Bonser (Jun 19)