nanog mailing list archives
Re: Internap FCP
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 07:17:31 +0530
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 11:55 PM, Nathan Stratton <nathan () robotics net> wrote:
On Mon, 6 Jun 2011, Ryan Pugatch wrote:We are currently looking into Internap FCP as we are in the process of redoing our network infrastructure and taking on managing BGP ourselvesThe reporting is not bad and it does an ok job. We ended up building our own because the FCP was not able to look at enough of the active flows. I believe the overall idea can provide a lot of value, it just was not the best solution for our needs.
Any alternatives? To start with, able to optimize routes across say two to four circuits. -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists () gmail com)
Current thread:
- Internap FCP Ryan Pugatch (Jun 06)
- Re: Internap FCP Nathan Stratton (Jun 06)
- Re: Internap FCP Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jun 06)
- Re: Internap FCP Nathan Stratton (Jun 06)