nanog mailing list archives

RE: Hotmail?


From: Vinny Abello <vinny () abellohome net>
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 19:13:24 -0400

On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 01:27:57 -0400, Steve Spence wrote:
That what I found with most the open source /Linux mail products that customizing and extending can be difficult and a lot of time and effort. The exchange is one of the easiest ways to roll out large scale web base
email  if just  expensive in upfront  costs.

Interns of Hotmail they initially use to use Solaris for the MTA and storage and FreeBSD for the web services ( Apache ) they suppose of migrated windows by now using windows products Again I think this highly customize solution which may not be very useful http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hotmail

we went through a similar search for a high volume solution which we could
customize and brand  right now we using we high a hybrid of
(exchange/Icewarp/Atmail/ two layers  of spam filtering )

As far as commercial packages go, Surgemail is worth a look. Very affordable and insanely powerful and customizable. The support team is the development team. It's not uncommon for bugs to be fixed in hours to day and even new features requests to be added in days to weeks. Runs on practically any major OS you prefer...

-Vinny


Current thread: