nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 routing protocols
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch () muada com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 14:30:50 +0200
On 10 jun 2011, at 14:26, Nick Hilliard wrote: [...] Of course none of this supports your original claim:
"IPv6 routing protocols also pretty much only use link locals". This is not true in the general case.
Current thread:
- Re: The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6, (continued)
- Re: The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6 Matt Addison (Jun 14)
- Re: The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6 William Herrin (Jun 10)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Nick Hilliard (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Ray Soucy (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Nick Hilliard (Jun 09)
- IPv6 routing protocols Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 10)
- Re: IPv6 routing protocols Nick Hilliard (Jun 10)
- Re: IPv6 routing protocols Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 10)
- Re: IPv6 routing protocols Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 10)
- Re: IPv6 routing protocols Nick Hilliard (Jun 10)
- Re: IPv6 routing protocols Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 10)
- Re: IPv6 routing protocols Owen DeLong (Jun 10)
- Re: IPv6 routing protocols Xiaoliang Zhao (Jun 10)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Owen DeLong (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Ray Soucy (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Tom Hill (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 ML (Jun 09)