nanog mailing list archives
Re: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route tablesizeconsiderations
From: Joe Maimon <jmaimon () ttec com>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 09:38:12 -0500
Jeff Wheeler wrote:
I'm glad SLAAC is an option, but that's all it is, an option. /64 LANs must also be considered optional, and should be considered useful only when SLAAC is desired.
That also could be optional, automatic host configuration does not actually require 64 bits, unless there is a naive assumption that DAD need not occur. Which it must always and for many reasons.
rfc3927 does not require 64 bits and works sufficiently well wherever it is employed. SLAAC should be redesigned to be configurable to work with however many bits are available to it and it should be a standard feature to turn that knob all the way from on - off with 128 bit stops in between.
And now DHCP-PD can start at any point in the connected hierarchy, working with whatever amount of space is available and not requiring complete upstream support.
I dont accept that IPv6 is set in stone. IPv4 wasnt/isnt set in stone and people were/are actually using it because they depend on it.
Joe
Current thread:
- RE: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 routetablesizeconsiderations, (continued)
- RE: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 routetablesizeconsiderations George Bonser (Mar 10)
- Re: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 routetablesizeconsiderations Dobbins, Roland (Mar 10)
- Re: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route tablesizeconsiderations Owen DeLong (Mar 10)
- Re: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route tablesizeconsiderations Dobbins, Roland (Mar 10)
- Re: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route tablesizeconsiderations Owen DeLong (Mar 10)
- Re: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route tablesizeconsiderations Dobbins, Roland (Mar 11)
- Re: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route tablesizeconsiderations James Stahr (Mar 11)
- Re: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route tablesizeconsiderations Tim Durack (Mar 11)
- Re: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route tablesizeconsiderations Richard A Steenbergen (Mar 11)
- Re: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route tablesizeconsiderations Jeff Wheeler (Mar 11)
- Re: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route tablesizeconsiderations Joe Maimon (Mar 11)
- Re: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route tablesizeconsiderations Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 11)
- Re: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route tablesizeconsiderations Joe Maimon (Mar 11)
- Re: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route tablesizeconsiderations Leo Bicknell (Mar 11)
- Re: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route tablesizeconsiderations Leo Bicknell (Mar 11)
- Re: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route tablesizeconsiderations Joe Maimon (Mar 11)
- Re: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route tablesizeconsiderations Pete Carah (Mar 11)
- Re: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route tablesizeconsiderations Owen DeLong (Mar 11)
- Re: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route tablesizeconsiderations Leo Bicknell (Mar 11)
- Re: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route tablesizeconsiderations Joe Maimon (Mar 12)
- Re: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route tablesizeconsiderations Hammer (Mar 14)