nanog mailing list archives
Re: Current recommendations for 2 x full bgp feed
From: George Herbert <george.herbert () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 8 May 2011 19:06:21 -0700
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 6:49 AM, Support <support () comgw co uk> wrote:
Can anyone give me their recommendation for current hardware to take 2 x full BGP feeds over 1Gb/s ports with a third Gb port for the local network? I did this about 6/7 years ago with a Cisco 7200VXR NPE300 256MB RAM but I'm guessing things have moved on???
Question - How sure are you that the number of incoming BGP feeds is and will permanently remain 2 and only two? I.e., do you need, or conceive of needing, a moderate expansion margin for the hardware selected? -- -george william herbert george.herbert () gmail com
Current thread:
- Current recommendations for 2 x full bgp feed Support (May 07)
- Re: Current recommendations for 2 x full bgp feed Raphael MAUNIER (May 07)
- Re: Current recommendations for 2 x full bgp feed Randy Carpenter (May 07)
- Re: Current recommendations for 2 x full bgp feed Bill Blackford (May 07)
- Re: Current recommendations for 2 x full bgp feed Jon Lewis (May 07)
- Re: Current recommendations for 2 x full bgp feed Support (May 07)
- RE: Current recommendations for 2 x full bgp feed George Bonser (May 07)
- RE: Current recommendations for 2 x full bgp feed Justin M. Streiner (May 07)
- Re: Current recommendations for 2 x full bgp feed Brent Jones (May 08)
- Re: Current recommendations for 2 x full bgp feed Brandon Ross (May 08)
- Re: Current recommendations for 2 x full bgp feed George Herbert (May 08)