nanog mailing list archives
Re: Suspecious anycast prefixes
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 09:51:37 +0200
I might not explain the background clearly and confused people. We're doing research on multiple origin AS issue, and we want to confirm if our inference is correct based on history data we collected. For example, we found several hundreds of prefixes with multiple origins more than two, some of them were inferred as anycast using our methodology, but we're not positive with the conjecture, so we want to find the ground truth from operators. Thanks for the detailed explanations.
the ucla obsession with multiple-origin announcements has a long history. the problem is that you think you can make something that looks forward. but how will you decide if tomorrow's announcement of P from A0 and A1 is anycast, ops kink, or an actual mis-announcement? randy
Current thread:
- Re: Suspecious anycast prefixes, (continued)
- Re: Suspecious anycast prefixes Yaoqing(Joey) Liu (May 05)
- Re: Suspecious anycast prefixes bmanning (May 05)
- Re: Suspecious anycast prefixes Joe Abley (May 05)
- Re: Suspecious anycast prefixes John Kristoff (May 05)
- Re: Suspecious anycast prefixes Yaoqing(Joey) Liu (May 05)
- Re: Suspecious anycast prefixes John Kristoff (May 05)
- Re: Suspecious anycast prefixes bmanning (May 05)
- Re: Suspecious anycast prefixes Yaoqing(Joey) Liu (May 05)
- Re: Suspecious anycast prefixes bmanning (May 05)
- Re: Suspecious anycast prefixes Yaoqing(Joey) Liu (May 09)
- Re: Suspecious anycast prefixes Randy Bush (May 10)
- Re: Suspecious anycast prefixes bmanning (May 05)
- Re: Suspecious anycast prefixes David Miller (May 03)
- Re: Suspecious anycast prefixes Danny McPherson (May 05)
- Re: Suspecious anycast prefixes David Miller (May 05)
- Re: Suspecious anycast prefixes Danny McPherson (May 05)
- Re: Suspecious anycast prefixes David Miller (May 05)
- Re: Suspecious anycast prefixes Danny McPherson (May 05)
- Re: Suspecious anycast prefixes bmanning (May 05)