nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 foot-dragging
From: ML <ml () kenweb org>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 23:14:25 -0400
On 5/11/2011 11:03 AM, james () jamesstewartsmith com wrote:
I have had similar problems with our providers, and these are tier 1 companies that should have already been full deployed. These are also some of the more expensive providers on a per Mb basis. The one provider that was full IPv6 ready was Cogent. HE is also IPv6 (although we don't use them atm.)
The same Cogent that asked me to pay extra for IPv6 and in return I get an incomplete IPv6 routing table?
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Joel Jaeggli (May 11)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging nick hatch (May 11)
- RE: IPv6 foot-dragging George Bonser (May 11)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 11)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Valdis . Kletnieks (May 11)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Doug Barton (May 11)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Mike Tancsa (May 11)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging William Astle (May 11)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging ML (May 11)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Sasa Ristic (May 12)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Owen DeLong (May 12)
- RE: IPv6 foot-dragging Anthony Francis - Handy Networks LLC (May 12)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Bernhard Schmidt (May 12)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Joe Loiacono (May 12)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Jeroen Massar (May 12)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Mikael Abrahamsson (May 12)
- RE: IPv6 foot-dragging George Bonser (May 12)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Martin Millnert (May 12)
- RE: IPv6 foot-dragging George Bonser (May 12)