nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 gateway, was: Re: IPv6 foot-dragging
From: Jeroen van Aart <jeroen () mompl net>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 13:15:08 -0700
Jeroen van Aart wrote:
Thanks all for the helpful suggestions.
Obviously I need to do a better job using documentation IPv6 consistently, so ignore any inconsistencies in that regard.
-- http://goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/ http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/faq/plural-of-virus.html
Current thread:
- IPv6 gateway, was: Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Jeroen van Aart (May 13)
- Re: IPv6 gateway, was: Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Jeroen van Aart (May 13)
- Re: IPv6 gateway, was: Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Jeroen van Aart (May 13)
- Re: IPv6 gateway, was: Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Owen DeLong (May 13)
- Re: IPv6 gateway, was: Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Jeroen van Aart (May 13)
- Re: IPv6 gateway, was: Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Owen DeLong (May 13)
- Re: IPv6 gateway, was: Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Owen DeLong (May 13)
- Re: IPv6 gateway, was: Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Todd Lyons (May 16)
- Re: IPv6 gateway, was: Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Erik Muller (May 17)