nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Conventions
From: Erik Muller <erikm () buh org>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 09:48:21 -0400
On 5/19/11 3:46 , Owen DeLong wrote:
Often, the time delay in DNS changes can be a blocking factor in addressing load issues by moving things around quickly. IP addresses can be moved with much greater agility than the DNS abstraction...
And having persistent IP address-to-service mappings aside from DNS can also be useful for other things like firewall/IDS rules that often don't use DNS at all.
-e
Current thread:
- IPv6 Conventions Todd Snyder (May 18)
- Re: IPv6 Conventions Jeroen Massar (May 18)
- Re: IPv6 Conventions Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 18)
- Re: IPv6 Conventions Cameron Byrne (May 18)
- Re: IPv6 Conventions Owen DeLong (May 18)
- Re: IPv6 Conventions Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 19)
- Re: IPv6 Conventions sthaug (May 19)
- Re: IPv6 Conventions Owen DeLong (May 19)
- Re: IPv6 Conventions Erik Muller (May 19)