nanog mailing list archives
Re: Verisign Internet Defence Network
From: Seth Mattinen <sethm () rollernet us>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 23:44:04 -0700
On 5/31/11 10:26 PM, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
My biggest gripe was their SLA - or lack of one. Back in Dec 2009 I forced them to start writing an SLA which they had not thought of, which back then showed an immaturity of service. Things might be different now. Verisign then took the view that the SLA should be based on *their* mitigation platform availability ("our scrubbing center has 100% SLA") and not on the customer site availability (all great and wonderful that your scrubbing center is up and running - but my site is down). They were willing to give service credits if their scrubbing center was down but not if the customer site was down. I found they had a well established customer portal and ample reporting facilities. Just make sure they have improved on their SLA before buying.
Sounds like a catch-22 though; if it's not always on and only starts scrubbing after an attack begins (pending activation approval from the customer which may take time), then the customer site is quite possibly already down when they start doing their thing to make it come back up. ~Seth
Current thread:
- Verisign Internet Defence Network Jim Mercer (May 30)
- Re: Verisign Internet Defence Network Rubens Kuhl (May 30)
- Re: Verisign Internet Defence Network Joel Jaeggli (May 30)
- RE: VeriSign Internet Defense Network Deepak Jain (May 31)
- Re: VeriSign Internet Defense Network Christopher Morrow (May 31)
- RE: VeriSign Internet Defense Network Stefan Fouant (May 31)
- RE: VeriSign Internet Defense Network Stefan Fouant (May 31)
- Re: Verisign Internet Defence Network Joel Jaeggli (May 30)
- Re: Verisign Internet Defence Network Rubens Kuhl (May 30)
- Re: Verisign Internet Defence Network Seth Mattinen (May 31)