nanog mailing list archives
RE: Cable standards question
From: "Holmes,David A" <dholmes () mwdh2o com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 09:31:50 -0800
Formal construction contract bids use the Construction Specification Institute (CSI) format. There are 2 versions, I am familiar with and use the 1998 version. The 1998 CSI format is broken up into 16 divisions (mechanical, civil, electrical, architectural, etc.). Electrical, where network cabling specs reside in the CSI 1998 version, are located in Division 16. The standard fiber optic spec is Division 16 16745. A web search on "fiber optic 16745 spec" will turn up various examples from real fiber optic construction bids, usually government contracts for large-scale construction projects such as highways, University campuses, municipal fiber builds, etc. My suggestion is to look at existing 16745 specs, and modify them to your requirements. -----Original Message----- From: Sam (Walter) Gailey [mailto:gaileywg () MANSFIELDCT ORG] Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 6:43 AM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: Cable standards question Hello, newbie question of the morning time, but hopefully not too off-topic... I run a small town network. A new building is being built that the town wants fiber access to. I have to specify for vendors what it is that the town expects in the cabling. I am (obviously) not a fiber expert, and I'm having trouble phrasing the language of the RFP so that we are assured a quality installation. My question is this; Is there an appropriate standard to specify for fiber-optic cabling that if it is followed the fiber will be installed correctly? Would specifying TIA/EIA 568-C.3, for example, be correct? I'm envisioning something like; "The vendor will provide fiber connectivity between (building A) and (building B). Vendor will be responsible for all building penetrations and terminations. When installing the fiber-optic cable the vendor will follow the appropriate TIA/EIA 568 standards for fiber-optic cabling." Any suggestions or examples of language would be very appreciated. Offlist contact is probably best. Many thanks, ---Sam This communication, together with any attachments or embedded links, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is confidential or legally protected. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, disclosure, copying, dissemination, distribution or use of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail message and delete the original and all copies of the communication, along with any attachments or embedded links, from your system.
Current thread:
- Cable standards question Sam (Walter) Gailey (Nov 14)
- Re: Cable standards question Daniel Seagraves (Nov 14)
- RE: Cable standards question Sam (Walter) Gailey (Nov 14)
- Re: Cable standards question Jon Lewis (Nov 14)
- Re: Cable standards question Jonathan Lassoff (Nov 14)
- Re: Cable standards question Jay Ashworth (Nov 14)
- Re: Cable standards question Jonathan Lassoff (Nov 14)
- RE: Cable standards question Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. (Nov 14)
- Re: Cable standards question Justin M. Streiner (Nov 14)
- RE: Cable standards question Jason Gurtz (Nov 14)
- Re: Cable standards question Jay Ashworth (Nov 14)
- RE: Cable standards question Jason Gurtz (Nov 14)
- RE: Cable standards question Holmes,David A (Nov 14)
- Re: Cable standards question Daniel Seagraves (Nov 14)