nanog mailing list archives
Re: economic value of low AS numbers
From: Robert Bonomi <bonomi () mail r-bonomi com>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 15:39:00 -0600 (CST)
From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi.com () nanog org Thu Nov 17 14:53:57 2011 Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 15:52:33 -0500 (EST) From: Jay Ashworth <jra () baylink com> To: NANOG <nanog () nanog org> Subject: Re: economic value of low AS numbers ----- Original Message -----From: "Dave Hart" <davehart () gmail com>On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 19:08, David Conrad <drc () virtualized org> wrote:whois -h whois.arin.net 42RFC 943: 42 THINK-AS [BJN1] [BJN1] Bruce Nemnich TMC BJN () MIT-MC ARPA I have no idea which registry was maintaining AS number registrations when AS42 changed hands. I suppose it's possible the current registrant acquired or merged with whatever entity THINK refers to, but I doubt it, so it seems likely at least at one time transfers were reflected in updated registrations.I'd be shocked, shocked I tell... oh, yes; put the money over here please. Shocked, I tell you, if that wasn't Thinking Machines Corp., which was formed by MIT grads, as I remember it. The real question is whether it was issued after HHGTTG.
I think it was abaout the time they clustered a group of nine 6-node machines.
Current thread:
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers, (continued)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Richard Irving (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers David Conrad (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Dave Hart (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Daniel Roesen (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Barry Shein (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Jay Ashworth (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Jeffrey Ollie (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Robert E. Seastrom (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Jeffrey Ollie (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Dave Hart (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Robert Bonomi (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Jay Ashworth (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Dave Hart (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Keegan Holley (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Jim Mercer (Nov 17)
- Message not available
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Owen DeLong (Nov 17)
- Message not available
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Owen DeLong (Nov 17)