nanog mailing list archives
Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 08:07:49 -0800
Worst case, you can always get an IPv6 static /48 from at least one provider without any additional cost. Owen On Nov 22, 2011, at 7:05 AM, Ray Soucy wrote:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Seth Mos <seth.mos () dds nl> wrote:What is bewildering to me is that each time the system establishes a new PPPoE session to the ISP they assign a different IPv6 prefix via delegation together with a differing IPv4 address for the WAN.Is this going to be forward for other consumer ISPs in the world?As long as a static allocation can be billed as a premium service, most providers will unfortunately do it. I often hear "if you need a static IP, you need business class server"; bundled with "we don't provide business service to residential customers". Almost makes one think there ought to be some consumer protection laws regulating it. -- Ray Soucy Epic Communications Specialist Phone: +1 (207) 561-3526 Networkmaine, a Unit of the University of Maine System http://www.networkmaine.net/
Current thread:
- Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation, (continued)
- Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 22)
- Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Ray Soucy (Nov 22)
- Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Owen DeLong (Nov 22)
- Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Tim Franklin (Nov 22)
- Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation David Conrad (Nov 22)
- Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Owen DeLong (Nov 22)
- Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 22)
- Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Owen DeLong (Nov 22)
- Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Brielle Bruns (Nov 22)
- Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Robert Bonomi (Nov 22)