nanog mailing list archives
Re: nanog53 network status
From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:43:35 +0100
On 10/10/2011 16:01, Anton Kapela wrote:
Please relay any outstanding issues my way--I'll route to Verilan, which is handling the network and wireless support for the meeting.
If Verilan has the ability to limit client power settings, these should also be reduced as far as possible. Some drivers ignore these hints, because the software driver authors know that MOAR POWER means better connectivity, right?. Verilan may find that completely disabling a tiny number of badly-behaved clients can dramatically improve quality of service for everyone else. Nick
Current thread:
- nanog53 network status Anton Kapela (Oct 10)
- Re: nanog53 network status Nick Hilliard (Oct 10)
- Re: nanog53 network status Noah Weis (Oct 10)
- Re: nanog53 network status Noah Weis (Oct 10)
- Re: nanog53 network status Jay Ashworth (Oct 10)
- Re: nanog53 network status Noah Weis (Oct 10)
- Re: nanog53 network status Nick Hilliard (Oct 10)