nanog mailing list archives
Re: meeting network
From: Dorn Hetzel <dorn () hetzel org>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 10:54:47 -0400
Maybe instead of upgrading the network of cities, we could convince Google to practice by upgrading the networks of a variety of hotels in locations that NANOG might find appealing :) On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org> wrote:
On 11/10/2011 14:12, John Curran wrote:is far better today then in the past, as there have been many conferences over the years where step 1 was pulling the coax or fiber through the hotel to establish their first-ever network infrastructure... :-)There is nothing more dispiriting than "yeah sure, you can pull in that fibre cable, but only on condition that you remove it immediately after the [conference|meeting|whatever] is over. We already have internet Then they point at the 2Mb DSL wifi AP and expect you to be impressed at their technology. Nick
Current thread:
- Re: meeting network, (continued)
- Re: meeting network Michael K. Smith - Adhost (Oct 11)
- Re: meeting network JC Dill (Oct 11)
- RE: meeting network Frank Bulk (Oct 11)
- Re: meeting network Randy Bush (Oct 11)
- Re: meeting network Jay Ashworth (Oct 10)
- Re: meeting network Joel jaeggli (Oct 10)
- Re: meeting network Randy Bush (Oct 10)
- Re: meeting network Owen DeLong (Oct 11)
- Re: meeting network John Curran (Oct 11)
- Re: meeting network Nick Hilliard (Oct 11)
- Re: meeting network Dorn Hetzel (Oct 11)
- Re: meeting network Owen DeLong (Oct 11)
- Re: meeting network Chris Adams (Oct 11)
- Re: meeting network Jay Ashworth (Oct 10)