nanog mailing list archives

Re: L3 announces new peering policy


From: "Scott Weeks" <surfer () mauigateway com>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 11:13:38 -0700

--- asr () latency net wrote:
From: Adam Rothschild <asr () latency net>

On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Scott Weeks <surfer () mauigateway com> wrote:
Isn't it just more of the same, or am I brainnumb today?

What's changed is the introduction of "bit miles" as a means of
calculating equality, where traffic ratios might previously have been
used.  Explained further, as pointed out on-list earlier:

 http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7021703819
 http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7021703818

What will be interesting is whether new peering adjacencies crop up as
a result of the new policy (I can think of several "smaller" global
networks which now qualify, as it's written), or if this is just
posturing on Level 3's part.  The next few months will be interesting
for sure...
----------------------------------------------------



I do recall the bit-miles conversations, but didn't tie that into this.  doh!  Thanks for the links.  That kind of 
detail is what I should've been looking for and it explains everything. 

scott


Current thread: