nanog mailing list archives
Re: [routing-wg] BGP Update Report
From: John Peach <john-nanog () johnpeach com>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 14:32:10 -0400
On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 14:25:56 -0400 Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 09:39:13 EDT, John Peach said:not really, given that he is not the sender, the mailing list is....We want to get pedantic, who generated the Message-ID: for the mail in question? ;)
I had no intentions of being pedantic; just pointing out that once the mail had gone to the mailing list there was no need to ever accept it back again.... -- John
Current thread:
- Re: [routing-wg] BGP Update Report, (continued)
- Re: [routing-wg] BGP Update Report Keegan Holley (Oct 15)
- Re: [routing-wg] BGP Update Report William F. Maton Sotomayor (Oct 16)
- Re: [routing-wg] BGP Update Report Skeeve Stevens (Oct 15)
- Re: [routing-wg] BGP Update Report Don Gould (Oct 15)
- Re: [routing-wg] BGP Update Report Charles N Wyble (Oct 15)
- Re: [routing-wg] BGP Update Report Randy Bush (Oct 15)
- Re: [routing-wg] BGP Update Report John Peach (Oct 15)
- Re: [routing-wg] BGP Update Report Skeeve Stevens (Oct 15)
- Re: [routing-wg] BGP Update Report John Peach (Oct 16)
- Re: [routing-wg] BGP Update Report Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 16)
- Re: [routing-wg] BGP Update Report John Peach (Oct 16)