nanog mailing list archives
Re: Colocation providers and ACL requests
From: James Ashton <james () gitflorida com>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 23:09:41 -0400 (EDT)
Christopher, This is pretty common policy. Not many datacenters of any size is going to act differently. If you don't purchase this service then you will not get the service. They may be willing work work with you on black-holing problem IPs though. This is pretty common, but don't expect a filtering package without purchasing it. James ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher Pilkington" <cjp () 0x1 net> To: "NANOG mailing list" <nanog () nanog org> Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 2:43:00 PM Subject: Colocation providers and ACL requests Is it common in the industry for a colocation provider, when requested to put an egress ACL facing us such as: deny udp any a.b.c.d/24 eq 80 …to refuse and tell us we must subscribe to their managed DDOS product? -cjp
Current thread:
- Re: Colocation providers and ACL requests, (continued)
- Re: Colocation providers and ACL requests PC (Oct 25)
- Re: Colocation providers and ACL requests Keegan Holley (Oct 25)
- Re: Colocation providers and ACL requests William Herrin (Oct 25)
- Re: Colocation providers and ACL requests Paul Graydon (Oct 25)
- Re: Colocation providers and ACL requests Keegan Holley (Oct 25)
- Re: Colocation providers and ACL requests Jay Ashworth (Oct 25)
- Re: Colocation providers and ACL requests Keegan Holley (Oct 26)
- Re: Colocation providers and ACL requests Jay Ashworth (Oct 26)
- Re: Colocation providers and ACL requests Keegan Holley (Oct 27)
- Re: Colocation providers and ACL requests Keegan Holley (Oct 25)
- Re: Colocation providers and ACL requests Christopher J. Pilkington (Oct 26)
- Re: Colocation providers and ACL requests Mike Gatti (Oct 30)